8100 G3/266 versus
G3/266 DT

Created 11/14/98
© 1998, 1999 Rob Art Morgan, editor of BARE FEATS
Gotta Question? Comment? Want to advertise?
Email Rob Art at
rob-art@barefeats.com

 

The 8100/G3 actually beat the G3/266 DT, thanks to the larger level 2 cache.

 

The G3/266 DT wins this test thanks to it's faster system bus speed (66MHz vs 33MHz)
 

Pretty much a draw.

 

The G3 helps the 8100 some, but it's no match for the G3/266 Desktop with its Rage II chip.
 

Same thing here. Things improve for the 8100 thanks to the G3, but it's smoked by the G3/266 Desktop.
  

Conclusions

 

Comments & Rebuttals from Readers

  1. The "wisdom" in upgrading a NuBus G3 becomes clear when you look at the HUGE investment some users, myself included, have in NuBus cards. The big expense in upgrading my system to a more current Mac would not be the CPU, but rather the PCI-based ProTools cards. I purchased a G3 PDS card, NuBus expansion chassis, and fast NuBus video card, all for about $1200. Upgrading my system to a PCI machine and replacing all my NuBus ProTools cards with the PCI versions (even through Digidesign's trade-up policy) would have cost me over $10,000! The decision was a no-brainer, even if it only lasts me a year.
  2. The Sonnet upgrade is completely incompatible with Digidesign NuBus hardware, and I would imagine a few other cards as well. I had a Sonnet 250 before I bought the Newer Technology MaxPowr 240, which is working perfectly.
  3. For a statement of compatibility by Sonnet Technology, go HERE.

Test Equipment & Procedures

Click here for more BARE FEATS speed results

© 1998, 1999 Rob Art Morgan, editor of BARE FEATS
Gotta Question? Comment? Want to advertise?
Email Rob Art at
rob-art@barefeats.com