Ê
MAIN INDEX of latest speed tests
|
||||
Posted July 28th, 2006, by rob-ART morgan, mad scientist Trans International now has a new notebook enclosure (miniXpress) for the new crop of Serial ATA notebook drives. The trend toward Serial ATA has taken hold with notebook drives. The MacBook Pro, and MacBook are the first Apple laptops to use SATA internal 2.5" drives. (The Intel Mac mini uses a SATA internal 2.5" drive, too.) Naturally those drives are available "bare" to put in an enclosure for external use. Or you may be looking to upgrade the internal SATA notebook drive and need for a new "home" for the factory SATA drive. Enter the miniXpress. The miniXpress enclosure's logic board uses the Oxford Semiconductor 924 chipset which accepts SATA drives and supports a triple interface (FireWire 800, FireWire 400, and USB 2.0). That comes in handy since that covers all the ports built into the current crop of Macs. External SATA ports require a third party host adapter. (Actually, the Oxford 924 chipset supports up to four interfaces include SATA as we learned from our tests on the Glyph Quad 3.5" SATA drive enclosure.) The miniXpress is made of anodized aluminum which is rugged and resists scratches, a welcome improvement over many notebook enclosures we've tested in the past. It's designed for excellent heat dissipation as well as anti-shock characteristics. (Though we really like it, this particular case design isn't unique to TransIntl. A few months ago we purchased an Oxford 922 based version of this case from CoolDrives designed Parallel ATA notebook drives -- which is what we used in this session to test the PATA version of the Hitachi 7K100.) WHICH IS BETTER, USB or FIREWIRE? If you use the FireWire ports, you don't need an A/C adapter with few exceptions. We say "few exceptions" since there are a few legacy Macs that don't generate enough bus power on the FireWire port to run without an A/C adapter. I believe all the currently shipping models of Mac will support this enclosure using FireWire bus power. FIREWIRE 800 versus 'pure' SATA Our hypothesis was that the FireWire 800 ports on the miniXpress just as fast as a pure SATA to SATA interface when doing large, sustained transfers -- since the rated speed of the SATA notebook drives is lower than the interface speed of FW800. There may be some gain with a pure SATA interface when doing small transfers that utilize the drive cache. To test our theory, measured the speeds of the 7200rpm and 5400rpm SATA notebook drives connected directly to a SATA host adapter (in addition to the FireWire 800 interface of the miniXpress). GRAPH LEGEND SUSTAINED TEST RANDOM TEST Sure enough, the sustained numbers of FW800 vs 'pure' SATA are about the same while the smaller random transfers as much as 23% faster with 'pure' SATA to SATA interface. We can see why most manufactures have made the switch to SATA for their laptop internal boot drives. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE NOTEBOOK DRIVE FILLS UP? As you can see, the 5400rpm drive is actually faster than the 7200rpm drive with 90GB of data stored on it. Furthermore, the 100GB 7200rpm drive is running out of room while the 5400rpm drive is only at 56% capacity. CONCLUSION UPDATE NOTES ON VARIOUS DRIVES TESTED The 5400rpm Hitachi Travelstar is the best compromise between speed, capacity, and power usage. Unless you are obsessed with speed (like us), it should be more than adequate for your everyday laptop needs. The 4200rpm Fujitsu 160GB SATA notebook drive posted impressive random transfer times. The average random transfer speeds were 55% faster than the 5400rpm Hitachi we tested. However, the 5400rpm Hitachi was 32% faster on sustained transfers. Fujitsu has a 200GB model MHV2200BT. If you prefer capacity over speed, that might be drive of interest. BIG 'WHOOPS': The Fujitsu notebook drives are thicker than the Hitachi and Seagate Notebook drives (12.5mm versus 9.5mm). Though we tested it with the miniXpress logic board, we could not close the case. I would assume it's also too thick for installing inside the MacBook and MacBook Pro. 4200 RPM vs 5400 RPM vs 7200 RPM However, there's a penalty for speed. The faster RPM, lower latency drives require more POWER which infers more HEAT AND SHORTER BATTERY LIFE. On the other hand, as you see above, the power usage penalty is about 10% for choosing a 7200rpm drive over a 5400rpm drive while the latency advantage is 31%. Therefore, it could be argued that the lower latency and faster seek time means the 7200rpm drive spends less time working -- thereby conserving power usage. EXTREME NOTEBOOK STORAGE RELATED ARTICLES FirmTek Serial ATA ExpressCard/34 for the MacBook Pro FirmTek Serial ATA CardBus for the PowerBook Glyph Quad Interface enclosure WHERE TO BUY THE TRANSINTL miniXpress TransIntl.com (They also have bare drives and memory for MacBooks, MacBook Pros, Intel iMacs, Intel Mac mini, PowerBooks, iBooks, and Power Macs) SOURCES OF OTHER BUS POWERED FireWire 800 STORAGE PRODUCTS SOURCES OF OTHER POWERBOOK and MACBOOK PRO PRODUCTS Small Dog Electronics (memory, drives, sleeves) Other World Computing (memory, FireWire and SATA enclosures, drives) Granite Digital (FireWire and SATA enclosures, drives, cables) MaxUpgrades (laptop sleeves and hard briefcases) MacGurus (SATA enclosures, drives, cables) FirmTek (Cardbus and ExpressCard/34 SATA host adapters, enclosures) Has Bare Feats helped you? How about helping Bare Feats? |
||||
"BARE facts on Macintosh speed FEATS" Email , the webmaster and mad scientist |
|