Originally
posted 8/26/02
Updated 8/27/02 with more graphics cards on the
1000MP
Continuing on our
quest for the "BEST BUY" in a G4 Power Mac,
let's look at things from a gamer's point of view.
Is the 1000MP that much faster than the 867MP? If
you get an 867MP with the optional 128MB GeForce4
Titanium, will it be just as fast as the 1000MP
with a Radeon 9000? Or is the iMac G4/800 with
GeForce4 MX just as fast?
We finally got a
DDR Power Mac 1000MP in the local lab and tested it
with three different graphics cards. And we tested
the DDR Power Mac 867MP with both the GeForce4 MX
and GeForce4 Titanium.
LEGEND for
GRAPHS: Rad 9000 = Radeon 9000, GeF4 MX = GeForce4
MX, GeF4 Ti = GeForce4 Titanium
As you can see,
when texture detail and geometric detail are set to
maximum, the GeForce4 Titanium provides a
significant boost to frame rates in Quake3 Arena.
And the 867MP with the GeForce4 Ti beats the 1000MP
with Radeon 9000.
But I'm hesitant
to recommend that you spend $250 to $400 on the
best graphics card when most games for the Mac are
CPU bound rather than graphics bound.
Take a look at
the results from Unreal Tournament below. As you
can see, the graphics card choice has little to do
with the frame rate, even at max quality textures.
And having dual CPU's doesn't help either. Most
games are like Unreal Tourney. The game is no
faster than the fastest single CPU.
CONCLUSION
Unless you are an
obsessive speed freak like me, get the Power Mac
with the default graphics card. Save your money for
adding memory and faster/bigger hard drives from
bargain third party sources. Gamers should buy the
fastest CPU they can afford. (Bargain minded gamers
should consider the "closeout" G4/933 selling for
$1400 from various sources. It would be faster than
the 867MP for most games.)
If you are a
Quake3 Arena fanatic and want more frames per
second, you can save hundreds of dollars by
upgrading to a GeForce3 or Radeon 8500. Those
"obsolete" but fast graphics cards are available
from outlets like MacResQ,
Other
World Computing,
MacGurus
and Buy.Com.
There are other
reasons to add a "deluxe" graphics card like
GeForce4 Titanium or the soon to be released
Radeon
9700.
Both cards provide 128MB's of video memory which
helps if you are running 3D apps on dual displays
at high resolution. The GeForce4 Ti comes with one
ADC connector and one DVI connector. So it doesn't
cost you an arm and a leg to connect dual ADC LCD
displays.
RETURN
TO THE FIRST TEST PAGE
RELATED
LINKS
Read about what
Apple has to say about the nVIDIA GeForce4 Titanium
on the GRAPHICS
page of
the Power Mac section. It includes an interesting
graph showing the relative speed of the three DDR
Power Macs running Quake3 Arena. (It looks like
they were running at "High Quality" instead of "Max
Quality" like I use. Regardless, the 1.25GHz DDR
Power Mac is only 13% faster than the 1GHz DDR
Power Mac!)
See nVIDIA's
specs on the GeForce4
Titanium.
(Apple's card is comparable to the 4600 chip
set.)
ATI has a
description page for the Radeon
8500 Mac Edition
and Radeon
9000 Mac Edition
on their site.
Anandtech
compares the Radeon
9000 to
the 8500, GeForce4 MX, and GeForce4 Titanium AGP
cards for Windows PC's. They also compare the
Geforce4
Go to the Radeon 9000
Mobility
(both are NEW chips for laptops.)
Read about the
new Radeon
9700 (Mac
Edition coming in a few months), which, according
to Anandtech.com's
tests, is 30 to 50% faster than the GeForce4
Titanium... at least when run on a Windows
PC.
TEST
NOTES
The "SDR" Power
Mac 1GHz MP had 1GB of PC133 CL2 SDRAM.
The "DDR" Power Mac 1GHz MP had 1.25GB of PC2700
CL2.5 DDR RAM
The "DDR" Power Mac 867MHz MP had 1GB of PC2100
CL2.5 DDR RAM
All three were running from an IBM 120GXP
drive.
Graphics cards
used:
GeForce4 MX
Radeon 9000
GeForce4 Titanium
For details on
each real world test, read "HOW
I TEST."
|